Thursday, March 11, 2010

Dragonball Z Kamehasutra Online

"The Tree and the Forest" - Olivier Ducastel and Jacques Martineau (2)

The action takes place in a possible country house, surrounded by a forest just as possible and undifferentiated. The lack of a continuous one to the other, or edit precipitous delimits fields airtight. The house would amount to both the heart of the village or along the country if we are not informed otherwise. We must believe. Each of these spaces is a theater scene, why not? From the forest to the house, a square of lawn, surrounded by a wall that is not perceive that the inner surface, provides how to transition. In this piece of enclosed garden, facing the door, our tree does not stop losing its leaves in a fall on purpose. Tones, a light golden slice behind the gloomy interiors, in a house which is difficult to understand the arrangements, the matter becomes a game of contrasts and differentiation. These biases mean something then. Is there a closer look?

Finally
not. Already the poster said too: look, the tree is only a shadow! The tree will then exist, each crystallize upon him the statements of his soul laid bare. Characters, meanwhile, will not leave the part they have been drawn. Can you live without shade? I followed mine on the sidewalk while ago, glad to see us rid of the gloomy skies of winter that you nimbent a lurid glow - without shadows. In film, if the scenario defined exactly, the character will not come out of the screen, narrow in its two dimensions, embarrassed the armholes. He can lift an arm, raising an eyebrow without anyone thinks: "Obviously, because" ... The characters gain in thickness to define a little hollow. The paradox is only apparent. This hollow point, the fictional magic fills better than a speech.

In Tree and forest , everything is explained, all have their place, nothing is left to chance. The music also must necessarily make sense. She captures the character of further interpreted by Frederick Guy Marchand. It is not only his taste for Wagner and each extract Ring superimposes a speech on the image and emphasizes state or intent. Marianne (Francoise Fabian) is in an explicitly. We can find others like this in the prelude to the Rheingold , work itself regarded as the prologue exposure of the three "movements" to follow. How? For these characters finally freed from their confinement inside, it all starts in the end credits? Hey! yes, it will be understood.

In this film cut in line, he is one that derives its mad ahead of the game I had not studied the distribution before seeing this movie, so I found with surprise and happiness. Once and quickly cracked the family secret, only an outsider to it could renew a semblance of dramatic tension. And this ex-stepdaughter reveals both less and more in this story what others do not want to put - much better than a stooge, safer and healthier. Catherine Mouchet gives a bit of breath at work, in particular his diction, trailing such an emphasis on syllable or ends of sentences as outstanding. It is a beautiful character she serves us there in three or four scenes, the simplest and most free time. His intentions are also the least expressed. We could judge moved his way to stay with these people who do nothing binds them so actively listen, to try to extirpate from others what they have buried, to choose exactly the music that will make them cry . But I think wanting to pull his own side of freedom.

We do not see enough. You do not hear enough. It transforms each of his lines but I finally regrets his presence, because in me so much frustration when the camera leaves her. And finally I could sadden me what a good big topic necessary like this has not led to more attention and finesse.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Whats The Best Outfit To Go To The Movies?

"The Tree and the Forest" - Olivier Ducastel and Jacques Martineau (1) Materials

Some near misses more than irritate the void. At least it plays Does the franchise: There is no hope. On a complete wreck, no need to procrastinate. It can be seen. It relies on fast in the end, the very next day we will have forgotten. It is the merit of the execrable. But first, the qualities spoil defects, not the reverse. In these half-failures, companies with mixed results, errors or imperfections lose the benefit of full and frank brutality, much better. The difference? The bitterness, for even taste good ideas against them and they leave too much to guess what these "mid-fig" will not "mi-raisin ', and all the nuances of flavors that they could haul it with . The rot extends often from the front we thought the most healthy.

We've already done the deed with "The Day of the skirt." Child, the recipe for a half-failure, nothing that the small ordinary. First a great big issue, that would call ill-intentioned juicy, you could say both "necessary" to give the user a certain language, that is to say passionate, political, sociological , syncretic ways, each on multiple planes, intimate and social, seems to feel and understand his time. Everything is there: the right subject, objectively good. It is not only the sole condition "necessary" and it is sufficient, which reduces happiness with the magnitude of the task. Following is a breeze since there is none. Instead, follow: the director does not seem to lack imagination? Change-in. A blind man will do, a paralyzed as well if it is in the subject. Narration work? A scenario, do not forget, is reduced to the statement, it is tied up when everything is said. Dialogues? Why? They might talk to a minister as a minister in better, as a cop in a cop better. Transcendence, is the death of subject. Hop! And for pity's sake, do not fumble the characters too, they could incarnate. The actors would make do if they have the stuff. See? Easy as pie. Especially not to let it rest - Land contradiction with the spirit of the recipe. Serve hot.

Neither great nor ridiculous. Neither beautiful nor detestable. Neither strong enough nor too amorphous. Thank you anyway to have scratched the surface. Teachers recognize themselves, students recognize themselves, everyone will find its share of stringy truth. That's the most outrageous: that you do your work gently. We do not blame you will because the very term rigor has lost all meaning long ago.

There are unfortunately some of those dunces who have more reason and pretend to forget our little scholarly manner. So? There goes her head? If you like. After all, you will use you to work faster. And if in "A Prophet" inmates or former inmates also found that once the truth of their prison, could not we dispense with the frills? Why get so upset, sweating water blood, alcohol, screaming like a madman? It allows itself the world there: the image, light, rhythm, development, invention, the raw and cooked ... Bah! You're not afraid of indigestion? Then work your character up myth? Write? Filming?! I swear, the infinite sadness ...

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Los Hombre Paco Streaming



Marble.


enamel.


Woods.


Glass.


Leather.


Kashmir.